Guide sections

Gender equal economies guide

Read More
Close

Enabling environment

  • Support the development of gender responsive national digital strategies, digital policies and legislation: ensure all gender equality considerations are integrated into all relevant strategies and policies. This includes national digital strategies; innovation policies; competition policies; sectoral policies aimed at fostering digital industries; and policies that support digital literacy, the digitalization of MSMEs, creative industries development, tech agribusiness promotion, energy transition and technology-based climate action. Involve women’s organizations and movements through participatory mechanisms to ensure women’s needs and priorities are fully incorporated at the whole public policy cycle.
  • Use digital technologies and data to inform gender responsive economic and poverty reduction policies: the combination of big data, data mining, digital technologies and other techniques which integrate sex-disaggregated, gender-disaggregated and other intersectional demographic variables, can help to build better evidence-based policies to propel gender responsive economic and poverty reduction policies.  
  • Bring together key public and private players of the digital, business and innovation ecosystem to support women tech founders and propel new business models and innovations to advance gender equality: Leverage UNDP’s whole-of-society approach to digital transformation by forging partnerships with key players including national and sub-national governments, big tech firms, digital platforms, educational institutions, suppliers, R&D organizations and more. Liaise with women’s and digital justice organizations to ensure business models and tech products and services – especially AI-based and machine learning based digital products – meet women’s needs and strategic interests, and do not reproduce gender bias and gender-based discrimination.

Business development services, incubation and acceleration

  • Gender responsive tailored policy and support services: Ensure incubators, innovation hubs and BDS providers design services in a gender sensitive way, considering barriers (such as availability of time, lack of access to funding, and limited access to internet) that are faced, predominantly by women from different backgrounds (such as People living with HIV and LGBTQI+ people).  
  • Broker partnerships: Foster gender responsive inclusive business models that are financially and commercially viable. Broker partnerships with the tech industry and other public and civil society partners. Ensure business models consider equitable practices including creating opportunities for those on low-incomes and vulnerable women whether as employees, suppliers, distributors or commercial partners.. As a broker UNDP can engage these stakeholders to ensure a multi-sector approach to conducting research or feasibility studies, building capacity, identifying market opportunities, and more.  

Innovation and incentives

  • Develop technology-based solutions: Engage academic institutions, incubators and accelerators to develop innovative and technology-based solutions to strengthen the capacity of MSMEs and women led SMES. Ensure tailored gender responsive entrepreneurial support is provided in a multi-faceted way and includes issues such as effective business management, approaches to reduce the carbon footprint, processes to reduce waste and costs, inventory tracking, financial management, and marketing.  
  • Ensure UNDP Digital Standards nurture and frame the creation of digital solutions for addressing gender inequalities: These standards provide guidance for UNDP teams on best practices when creating digital solutions for development. These standards are guided by the leave no one behind approach and by definition are not gender blind but propel gender transformative digital programming.  
  • Adopt a multi-stakeholder approach: Engage social enterprises, impact innovators, research institutions, digital providers and other key stakeholders of the digital ecosystem in the development of gender responsive digital solutions.
  • Engage women’s organisations: Help connect women’s organizations and movements with private sector developers, impact innovators and social enterprises so they can participate in the design and testing of gender responsive digital products and services.

UNDP Digital Standards: a gender responsive deep dive

Digital Standards provide a framework for innovation and improvement. By setting standards for how digital information is managed and exchanged, and how digital products are created, UNDP can help ensure that new technologies are used effectively, efficiently and ethically, to support development goals and help UNDP to keep pace with the rapidly changing technology landscape. The Digital Standards build upon the Principles for Digital Development but are UNDP-specific and leverage the experience and breadth of the organisation.

By adhering to digital standards UNDP can build trust with our partners and stakeholders. When UNDP uses standard formats and protocols it demonstrates our commitment to open communication and collaboration. This helps UNDP to establish itself as a reliable and trustworthy development partner and a thought leader in digital transformation.

  1. Start with the need: This standard links to two Principles for Digital Development: Design with the User and Understanding the Existing Ecosystem. Don’t start with a technology and then search for a way to use it. Start with a clear understanding of the challenge you address. Understand your intended user’s needs, context and technology constraints. Identify the need with women from different backgrounds , LGBTIQ+ individuals and organizations defending the rights of others. Feed real end-user requirements directly from women’s voices, understand their needs and strategic interests and co-develop digital solutions for them with them.
  2. Bridge the digital divide: This standard is linked to the Principle: Design With the User. To Leave No One Behind, it is vital to understand what barriers exist to accessing digital solutions. To build gender inclusive digital services one must be intentional about tackling the gender digital divide and follow accessibility best practices. The digital divide is not only about access to Internet, it is also about affordability, safety, , digital literacy and skills and discriminatory social norms that particularly impact women, LGBTIQ+ people, people living with HIV and women from different backgrounds from using digital solutions.  
  3. Test early and often: This standard is linked to the Principle: Design With the User. Building a digital product or service needs continuous user feedback. Build prototypes, test and learn with women, LGBTIQ+ people, people living with HIV and women from different backgrounds.
  4. (Perhaps) Don’t build it: This standard is linked to the Principle: Reuse and Improve. There is no need to ‘re-code’ the wheel. You can use an off-the-shelf platform using the SaaS (Software as a Service) model or build on top of or use existing open-source platforms and Digital Public Goods (DPGs). Only build something new if required. Can you get 70-90 percent of what you need for 10-20 percent of the effort? If so, don’t build from scratch.
  5. Do no harm: This standard is linked to the Principle: Design With the User and Address Privacy and Security. Ensure human’s rights, women’s rights and LGBTQI+ rights are protected across the value chain.
  6. Form the right team: This standard is linked to the Principle: Be Collaborative. Form gender diverse teams, include women intentionally in traditionally male-dominated positions such as user research, UX (User Experience) and UI (User Interface) design, product and project management, and sector/industry/challenge specific knowledge. Use gender responsive procurement principles if services are procured from third parties and procure services from women-owned business and women-owned tech firms.  
  7. Measure what matters: This standard is linked to the Principle:  Be Data-Driven. Every project needs a clear, upfront definition of success and failure. This means attaching numbers to measurable outcomes. Ensure gender disaggregated data is gathered from your product. Ensure metrics are also collected to assess gendered impacts of your operations, for example track hate speech events in general and against women at most risk such as women politicians, LGBTQI+ advocates, women’s rights defenders and women environmental defenders.  
  8. Follow the UNDP Data Principles:. Ensure the data of women, LGBTIQ+ people, people living with HIV and women from different backgrounds is not leaked to malicious third parties, that personal data is not unnecessarily collected and that it is not overshared with third parties.
  9. Default to open: This standard is linked to the Principles:   Be Open,  Reuse and Improve and Be Collaborative. Make your project open-source, and use open-source components when possible. Publish your project code to UNDP Github and make it public after validating that it can be shared. Turn your products into DPGs and provide open APIs whenever possible.  
  10. Plan for the long term: This standard is linked to the Principles: Design for Scale and Build for Sustainability. Plan for maintaining your product and plan for engaging the user to discover, adopt and use the solution. Develop gender responsive user engagement plans considering key gender barriers such as – connectivity, affordability, access to equipment, restrictive social norms, digital skills and literacy.

More information:  https://www.undp.org/digital/standards/

Livelihoods and economic recovery guide - Risk Section

Digital divides

Risks of Unaddressed Digital Divides:

  • As digital technologies become fundamental to many aspects of modern life, an unaddressed digital divide can magnify existing socio-economic disparities. Those without access or skills can find themselves further marginalised, unable to access essential services, employment opportunities, or information.
  • The growing digital divide can result in greater inequality and persistent poverty. Individuals without digital access may miss opportunities for growth, education, and active participation in society.

Gendered Digital Divides and Household Dynamics:

  • Gender dynamics, deeply rooted in societal norms and structures, can extend into the digital realm. In many cultures and households, if the head (often male) dominates the use of digital tools, it can suppress other members', particularly women's, ability to utilise these resources.
  • This can further limit their independence, access to education, or economic opportunities. The gender digital divide doesn't just pertain to access, but also how and who gets to use the available digital tools within a family or community.

Challenges of Broad Coalitions in Digital Tech Management:

  • The sheer breadth and complexity of digital technologies require collaborative efforts to make them universally accessible and affordable. This includes addressing the costs of technologies, ensuring connectivity, and providing devices.
  • Forming broad coalitions can be challenging due to differing stakeholder interests, the vastness of infrastructural needs, and the rapid pace of technological evolution.
  • Without such coalitions, we run the risk of developing fragmented solutions that lack a comprehensive and sustainable approach. This can result in disjointed digital ecosystems that are not only costly and inefficient but also exclusive. Moreover, there's a danger of inadvertently fostering monopolies where a single private sector entity dominates critical digital infrastructure within a country.
Data and analysis

Risks of Poor Data Management and Integrity:

  • In the digital era, decisions are becoming more reliant on data. However, the quality of this data is paramount. Poor data quality can arise from various issues: underrepresentation of minorities, incompatible datasets, missing values, inaccuracies, and biases, to name a few. When the standards for analyzing and sharing such data aren't up to par, there's a risk of distorting the actual state of affairs.
  • Using misinterpreted or erroneous data as a foundation can result in policies, strategies, and actions that not only miss their mark but could unintentionally harm society. For example, if minorities are underrepresented in data, decisions might neglect their specific needs or perspectives. The ramifications of these ill-informed decisions extend beyond economic or logistical concerns; they can also influence socio-cultural dynamics and political landscapes. In short, poor data quality can culminate in choices that don't reflect or serve the broader community's best interests.  

Undesired Outcomes and External Interference from Non-State Actors:

  • The digital realm, while a force for good, also opens doors for non-state actors to exploit the system for their benefit. This can range from entities using digital platforms for propaganda to others exploiting digital infrastructures for economic gains, often at the expense of genuine users or the broader society. This can be particularly harmful in conflict affected settings.
  • "Free riding" refers to entities or individuals benefitting from resources or services without contributing to the cost or effort. In a digital context, non-state actors might leverage digital resources or platforms without contributing to their upkeep or integrity, which can strain or corrupt these systems.
  • It's vital to anticipate these potential negative effects and establish safeguards. Without proactive measures, there's a risk of allowing these actors to undermine public trust, security, and the overall integrity of the digital landscape.
Security and privacy threats

Vulnerabilities in Digital Systems - Hacking and Cybersecurity:

  • The increasing digitisation of our systems and infrastructure has inadvertently made them attractive targets for malicious actors. Hacking attempts and cyber-attacks can compromise the integrity, availability, and confidentiality of data.
  • The repercussions of such breaches can be profound. For instance, a compromise in the digital infrastructure of utilities can disrupt essential services, potentially jeopardising the safety and well-being of countless individuals.
  • Thus, the absence of robust cybersecurity measures can place not just data but also crucial infrastructure and by extension, society itself, at substantial risk. It underscores the paramount importance of ensuring digital systems are fortified against potential cyber threats.

The Unknowing Surrender of Data by Individuals:

  • With the convenience and allure of digital platforms and tools, many individuals might inadvertently hand over personal or sensitive data without full comprehension of the implications.
  • Often, the terms of data usage, storage, and sharing are buried in lengthy terms of service agreements, leading to a lack of informed consent.
  • Over time, this can have far-reaching consequences. Such data might be used for targeted marketing, profiling, or even more nefarious purposes. In the long run, individuals may face invasions of privacy, identity theft, or manipulation, underscoring the need for greater transparency and education about data rights and implications.

Misuse of Digital Platforms by Non-Governmental Entities:

  • While digital platforms offer tremendous value for communication, collaboration, and community building, they are not immune to misuse. Non-governmental actors, whether they're extremist groups, criminal networks, or malicious individuals, can exploit these platforms or the data.
  • By disseminating misinformation, inciting violence, or recruiting for illicit causes, these actors can pose significant threats to communities, nations, and global stability.
  • It's imperative to have vigilant monitoring, robust reporting mechanisms, and active countermeasures in place to ensure that digital platforms remain safe, credible, and genuinely beneficial for their users.

Misuse of Data during Government Transitions:

  • Changes in government, particularly in unstable or transitional environments, can pose risks concerning the misuse of data collected by organizations like the UNDP. New regimes or political entities might access and utilize beneficiary data for purposes other than what it was initially intended for, potentially endangering individuals and undermining the trust in international organizations.
  • In some scenarios, this data could be used for surveillance, discrimination, or even persecution of certain groups or individuals based on their affiliations or the aid they have received. This not only breaches privacy but also endangers lives and further complicates the humanitarian and developmental efforts in the region.
  • It's crucial for organizations, especially those with a significant stake in peacekeeping and developmental roles, to have stringent data protection protocols. This includes ensuring data encryption, anonymizing data where possible, and setting conditions for data access and sharing. Such measures ensure that beneficiary data remains secure and is not misused, regardless of political transitions or changes in governance.
Social, misinformation and unrest

The Speedy Spread of Misinformation and Its Impact:

  • In our digital age, information travels at an unprecedented speed, reaching global audiences in mere seconds. However, this rapid dissemination isn't exclusive to accurate information; misinformation can propagate just as swiftly.
  • Misinformation can drastically affect public perception, behaviour, and decision-making. In contexts where public trust is paramount, such as public health or elections, misinformation can lead to harmful outcomes or erode democratic processes.
  • Moreover, when markets are concerned, misinformation can induce panic, inspire undue confidence, or trigger erratic behaviours among investors and consumers alike. Such volatility is not only detrimental to the economic landscape but can also lead to significant socio-economic unrest.

The Specific Threats of Market Disinformation:

  • Market disinformation threatens livelihoods and hampers economic recovery by undermining trust in markets, including financial systems. This can lead to misguided investments and potentially destabilizing entire sectors vital for growth.  
  • Furthermore, scams that deceive entrepreneurs and businesses into believing they can register for non-existent government support not only rob them of resources but also erode trust in legitimate relief measures.